President Putin doesn’t yet have a reputation for interminably long speeches. Unlike many of his predecessors of course he’s comparatively concise and brief.
Yet his annual call-in television show went on for nearly five hours this week…4 hours 47 minutes–85 questions answered. That’s significantly more than India’s Rahul Gandhi managed after his speech a few weeks ago.
Putin’s was not a marathon speech. But it was an impressive question and answer session. One of the longest we’ve come across.
There’s some relationship between totalitarianism and lengthy speeches. That’s an observed relationship and not one that necessarily stands up to full scientific investigation.
President Putin is democratically elected, irregularities in the voting aside, and the length of his speeches are pretty standard in contrast to his predecessors. Predecessors who weren’t elected with the popular vote. Perhaps his lengthy question and answer session reflects the democracy that underpins his position?
Elsewhere in the world, we’ve looked at the speeches of President Mugabe, the public speaking of Fidel Castro and the speeches of the late Hugo Chavez. Colonel Gaddafi’s speeches were equally notorious. All have or had a propensity for long-winded speeches. And all have or had a whiff of authoritarianism.
Megan Lane of the the BBC News magazine explored this very issue some years ago. Her observations noted that democratically elected leaders today don’t dare to give a lengthy speech…fearing their audience will get bored, restless or just disappear.
In contrast, authoritarian leaders have no such fear. Their audiences won’t want to provide an excuse for the security team to punish them for yawning! Their disappearance might not be voluntary.
That’s another observed assessment that might not stand up to full scrutiny. But it sounds feasible.
Pity then the tired old authoritarian leader whose speeches are a yawn, whose public speaking has lost its edge and whose audiences are no longer worried with hiding their feelings. That’s the situation for Robert Mugabe.
But for the last word on lengthy speeches we have the example of China to fall back on…no stranger to authoritarianism. Chinese state media reported last year that the mayor of Guangzhou has had enough of lengthy speeches–he took a fifty-eight-minute speech to say so.
The Mayor, Wan Qingliang, told a local Party meeting that speeches should last no longer than one hour for key meetings, and half an hour for other meetings.
Perhaps authoritarian speakers can change their public speaking habits after all…but it takes a unilateral decision, no debate and absolutely no dissent. Way to go.
The Principal Trainer at training business Time to Market. Based in Bracknell, I run presentation and public speaking training courses, coaching sessions and seminars throughout the UK. Andrew Ivey on Google+
Resignation Speech Proves Brevity is Best
All Quiet on the EU Referendum Front
Talk Is Not So Cheap For Flying Baron Paddick
Not Lost For Words But No Speech Transcript From Hillary
INtogether Speech by Tim Farron Starts Campaign
How to Handle Interruptions During Your Speech
Jeremy Corbyn Conference Speech
Natalie Bennett Speech at Bournemouth 2015