There’s a time and a place for everything. And when you are the British Prime Minister that adage is most applicable when you are on an overseas tour.
There was a time when British Prime Ministers and Foreign Secretaries would routinely lambast the Beijing regime for its human rights abuses. No more. Now they duck the issue.
Lambasting the human rights records of other countries, in the form of speeches and interviews, is reserved for Myanmar (Burma), North Korea, Sudan and Iran. It’s not that the human rights situation has dramatically improved in China. No, it’s the case that making speeches on the subject is both a waste of time and effort and impractical.
And so it was last week when David Cameron gave his speech at Peking University.
This wasn’t the occasion for a lecture or a sermon.
His speech began with a reference to his visit to Hong Kong when he was a student–25 years ago. This note allowed the Prime Minister to relate just how much China had changed in the intervening 25 years. He developed this contrast with a series of repetitions:
“No longer can people talk about the global economy
without including the country that has grown on average ten per cent a year for three decades.
No longer can we talk about trade
without the country that is now the world’s largest exporter and third largest importer
And no longer can we debate energy security or climate change
without the country that is one of the world’s biggest consumer of energy.”
The speech moved on to the question of whether China is a threat or an opportunity. His answer was decisive: an opportunity.
His speech included a well-worked position taker about the United Kingdom’s relationship with China:
“Now people can react to this in one of two ways.
They can see China’s rise as a threat
or they can see it as an opportunity.
They can protect their markets from China
or open their markets to China.
They can try and shut China out
or welcome China in, to a new place at the top table of global affairs.”
He took this position-taker even further in his speech with:
“In the argument about how to react to the rise of China
I say it’s an opportunity.
I choose engagement not disengagement.
Dialogue not stand-off.
Mutual benefit, not zero-sum game.
Partnership not protectionism.
Britain is the country that argues most passionately for globalisation and free trade.
Free trade is in our DNA.”
The Prime Minister’s speeches are not yet becoming hackneyed. That will no doubt come, but his references to “zero-sum game” and “free trade is in our DNA” are used elsewhere by government ministers. He even managed to use “Globalisation is not a zero sum game” later in the same speech.
His speech then examined the economic and political responsibilities that a resurgent China now has. This was a good account, made slightly more other-worldly with the Prime Minister’s idea that China should sort out unsavoury regimes in Afria and Asia as part of its trade mission. Realpolitik, anyone?
The conclusion to his speech took a familiar path, referencing Confucius and stormy metaphors.
“Proof, perhaps, that Confucius was right when he said
within the four seas all men are brothers
Yes, there we will be storms to weather.
Yes, there will be perils to overcome.
Yes, we will have to persevere.
But it will be worth it – for Britain, for China and for the world.”
An altogether well-worked speech that sets the tone for more trade between the two countries…just don’t mention the human rights.
The Principal Trainer at training business Time to Market. Based in Oxford, I run presentation and public speaking training courses, coaching sessions and seminars throughout the UK. Andrew Ivey on Google+
Taoiseach Speech Borders On Brexit Practicalities
Final Campaign Speeches
Set-Piece Speech Savages SNP In Glasgow
Pilot Speech Navigates To No-Fly Zone
Brexit Speech Sets Out The 12 Point Plan
Speech Distractions: How To Manage a Seasonal Distraction
Fiery Best Man’s Speech Sets Wedding Reception Alight
Clinton Speech Imagines A World With Trump In The White House